Olympia wrote:
If he was liable to make a mistake like that he should not have been flying solo. I have instructed at both flat and ridge sites, and at the latter you had to be absolutely sure that a pupil understood the dangers at a ridge site which do not exist on a flat one. If this hapless guy had had a bad accident then the instructor in charge on the day would have been having to answer some very awkward questions at the official enquiry, or inquest (if it had gone that wrong).
I sense a shrugging of the shoulders here. Aeroplanes bite fools, and this has to be uppermost in your mind when deciding whether a pupil should fly solo.
Yes, my point in particular. Frequently I will put limits** on my solo endorsements (e.g. "OK for solo in mild conditions").
Our club requires solo flights to be supervised by an in-person instructor as well.
This student did manage to do one thing right: he didn't try to re-cross the ridge from the lee side. The ridge instruction must have gotten that far at least, and the landing on the road probably was transfer from his time
as a power pilot. He did manage to walk away from the accident.
** (Endorsing transition pilots in the US has to be time limited, since otherwise your student will vanish from your life
to legally fly unsupervised forever!)