mach_one_man wrote:
So it doesnt distort the image in anyway either then?
I have track IR now, so is it still possible to use it with track IR? I suppose if I place the device above the lens it should be ok?
The curved sides of the image in the photo is due to the wide angle lens setting on my digital camera. In reality the distortion is almost non existant.
The grooves in the plastic that make the lens are so fine they are barely visible at a glance and much finer than the grooves in an LP record.
I've played around a bit more and I agree with David Grigg that 9" spacing giving a 30" diagonal gives an even better image . I'm going to make ap a box to mount the lens tomorrow and will post results.
I also have a Track IR3. The sensor will have to be mounted on a short wooden post and pointed down a little, so that the reflected beam can clear the lens. Not a problem I don't think.
This is an awesomly cheap mod for flight simming that gives great results.
For those who didn't get far enough on the web page I cited in the last post , this was David Griggs report...
"UPDATE September 2005:
I just got this feedback from David Grigg:
Rick,
I found you website (totally by accident) and, as an avid flight simmer, had to try out the fresnel lens setup. I checked all around, studied up on the differences in fresnel lenses and finally decided on the F550 lens from 3Dlens.com. I would HIGHLY recommend this lens and this company.
It is amazing! This lens is just lightly larger than my 19" monitor screen and is very high resolution with its 0.2mm grove pitch. After some experimentation, I settled on a box depth of 9". The result was effectively a 30" monitor with incredible depth perception and virtually no distortion or loss of resolution.
I don't know how I ever survived without a fresnel lens before. I've been turning all my flight sim buddies on to your site and to the Fresnel lens.
Thanks for taking the time to put up this site. David Grigg. "
Mark